Television and mass culture. Television and mass culture Direction of mass culture examples

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Similar documents

    Television as a means of influence, stages of its formation. Criticism of Russian television on the pages of Literaturnaya Gazeta. Typological characteristics of the publication, newspaper design. Analysis of materials from television critics of Literaturnaya Gazeta.

    course work, added 05/01/2010

    Identification of the peculiarities of the influence of Russian television on the way of thinking, formation of values ​​and culture of a modern young man. Television as a sociocultural phenomenon. Federal target program for the development of television and radio broadcasting until 2015.

    course work, added 04/25/2014

    The advent of television. Prospects for the development of television. Features and style of Russian television. Disadvantages of television. New media configuration. Non-state media. Television ceases to play the role of master of minds.

    abstract, added 03/15/2004

    Study of modern Russian popular science television. Its relationship with education, functions from the point of view of the source of knowledge. Features and genres of popular science television. A comprehensive system for optimizing its development in the country.

    course work, added 12/23/2013

    The formation and development of television in Russia, assessment of Russian television. Features and modern style of television and its disadvantages. Prospects for the development of one of the newest communicative tools in educating a person in modern society.

    abstract, added 12/16/2011

    Characteristics of Russian television on modern stage, the intellectual orientation of modern television. Characteristics and technologies of intellectual programs on Russian television: knowledge games for money and intellectual talk shows.

    course work, added 08/10/2010

    Youth television: general characteristics. Background: the emergence of youth programs on Russian television. Development of youth television. Specifics of youth TV channels. Popular programs of modern television and their analysis.

    course work, added 12/28/2016

    Creation and development of Mongolian television. The nature of television broadcasting in the early years. Mongolian television in the 90s. Official Mongolian TV channels and cable television. Television in modern Mongolia, the main problems of its development.

    course work, added 11/25/2013

  • Bring specific example phenomena of mass culture. Highlight the relevant features in it and explain how it affects the consumer
  • Example: modern pop (pop music, TV shows)
    Signs: the most important thing is accessible to the majority, does not require monetary expenditure, arose at the time of globalization.
    Influence: positive, entertains people, provides an opportunity to get acquainted with the culture of other countries (example: manner of singing, dancing, speaking)
  • There can be many examples, but the most common is perhaps television. It is an example of mass culture, since it is obviously of a mass nature, that is, it is well distributed among people. Of course, television is of great importance and influence on ordinary people, having a strong impact. Through TV, people can get a lot of different information, which can even manipulate the masses.

  • Give an example of a mass culture phenomenon, highlight the relevant features in it and explain how they affect the consumer
  • There can be many examples, but perhaps the most common is television. It is an example of mass culture, since it is obviously of a mass nature, that is, it is well distributed among people. Of course, television is of great importance and influence on ordinary people, having a strong impact. Through TV, people can get a lot of different information, which can even manipulate the masses.
  • 1) Explain how the concept of right differs from the concept of law.

    2) Why is it that in the entire vast system of legal acts of the country only one constitution has the highest legal force?

    3) How does the separation of powers enable other principles of the rule of law to operate?

  • 1.) Unlike laws, rights are not always enshrined in law. Right can be a moral judgment or a category.

    2.) According to the pan-European legal tradition, originating in judicial practices Roman Empire, it is the constitution that is the fundamental law of the state, which means it has the highest legal force.

    3.) The separation of powers performs an important function in the functioning of the rule of law - it balances the balance of power and protects against its abuse.

  • The Constitution of the Russian Federation (Article 48, Part 1) proclaims: “Everyone is guaranteed the right to receive qualified legal assistance.” Explain how this constitutional provision is enforced.
  • In our life, this is manifested by the fact that there are offices with lawyers who can advise on any issue; there are also consumer rights organizations that can answer any of your questions: who to contact and what to do in a given situation, but if the question is confusing, of course, this is already a consultation will cost money

    such that there is such a legal principle PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE - this is a legal principle according to which the accused is considered innocent until his guilt is proven in court! (proven in the prescribed manner legally)

    That’s why the accused are given lawyers to protect their rights! And they proved that their client was not guilty!

  • How does the economy serve people?

    Which form of farming most successfully achieves economic goals?

    What are the similarities and differences between the economic interests of the producer and the consumer?

    How are the activities of the main participants in the economy interconnected?

  • Economics plays a huge role in the life of society. It provides people with material conditions of existence - food, clothing, housing and other consumer goods. The economy creates supply and demand, which will find their implementation in goods and services

    An effective form of management is mixed economy, which is regulated by the state . It's like this economic system, where is the state and private sector play an important role in the production, distribution, exchange and consumption of all resources and material goods in the country/

    The general thing is that the consumer uses what the manufacturer made, and the difference is that one pays for it, and the other receives.

    By how much one makes and sells, another can understand how much he needs to produce his goods. For example: If one produces a lot of phones that sell out instantly, another might produce more phone cases

  • Can you help?

    I will be very grateful)

    Search magazines and newspapers for information about small businesses. Draw a conclusion about in which areas or sectors of the economy there are a significant number of them.

    2. What do you think morality in business can be based on: education, religion, conscience, responsibility? What moral qualities of an entrepreneur do you consider the most important? Explain why.

    3. “A firm is a system of relationships that arise when the direction of resources begins to depend on the entrepreneur.” Justify the validity of this definition given by the English scientist Ronald Coase.

    4. Imagine that a friend of yours creates an enterprise and personally invests 200 thousand rubles. , and his friend - 50 thousand rubles. This means that the friend owns 80% authorized capital, and his friend – 20%. Having successfully sold their products and paid taxes, they received a profit of 400 thousand rubles. How and in what amount will profits be distributed between them?

  • 1. Mainly in the field of trade.

    2. In business, in principle, there is no such morality, but for me, education and responsibility are more important in business.

    3. Well, for example, the attitude of the team and management certainly depends on entrepreneurship, since together they went to common success, that is, to a good review, for example, from an entrepreneur

    4. I think I need a ratio of 80% and 20%. This is how I was able to help)

    All the best to you!

  • From the work of the Russian philosopher I. A. Ilyin “On legal consciousness.” If a person wants to see his personal rights secured and protected, then he must invest his legal consciousness in this public legal life and faithfully participate in its organization. As a legislator, he must correctly create laws from the correct depth of his legal consciousness; as a judge and official, he must interpret and apply the law as required by his fair sense of justice; as an ordinary subordinate citizen, he must accept the law into his legal consciousness and include the orders, prohibitions and permissions contained in the law in the processes of motivating his behavior. In all these provisions, a person is called upon to voluntarily impute to himself the laws of his state, to try to correctly understand them and obey them out of a sense of freely recognized duty. Even if these laws seem formal and external to him, he still must accept them as self-binding and faithfully observe them. This is necessary for the following reasons. Firstly, because the very essence of law and order includes this ability - to improve through the loyal obedience of citizens. .. Secondly, a citizen is called upon to voluntarily recognize and comply with the laws of his homeland because this is the only way to maintain law and order and at the same time remain free in it. QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE DOCUMENT 1. What features of legal consciousness does I. A. Ilyin note? 2. Explain how a person can take part in the legal life of society. 3. What new aspect, in comparison with the text of the textbook, did the author reveal in the characterization of legal consciousness? What do you see as the particular value of this aspect?
  • 1. Mainly in the text, such features of legal consciousness are noted as responsibility for one’s actions, readiness to comply even with those laws, the purpose of which is not too clear to a person.

    2. A person observes the laws, remaining free within their framework, and perhaps improves them himself.

    3. I didn’t see the text of the textbook (((

  • Absolutism - (absolute monarchy) - a form of feudal state in which the monarch has unlimited supreme power. Under absolutism, the state reaches the highest degree of centralization, an extensive bureaucratic apparatus, a standing army and police are created; the activities of class representation bodies, as a rule, cease. The rise of absolutism in Western countries. Europe falls on the 17th-18th centuries. In Russia, absolutism existed in the 18th and early 20th centuries. in the form of autocracy. From a formal legal point of view, with absolutism, the fullness of the legislative executive power is concentrated in the hands of the head of state, a monk; he independently establishes taxes and disposes public finance. The social support of absolutism is the nobility. The justification for absolutism was the thesis of the divine origin of supreme power. Magnificent and palace etiquette served to exalt the person of the sovereign. At the first stage, absolutism was progressive in nature: it fought against the separatism of the feudal nobility, subordinated the church to the state, eliminated the remnants of feudal fragmentation, and introduced uniform laws. The absolute monarchy is characterized by a policy of protectionism and mercantilism, which contributed to the development national economy, commercial and industrial bourgeoisie. New economic resources used by absolutism to strengthen the military power of the state and conduct wars of conquest. As capitalism developed and strengthened in European countries, the principles of the existence of an absolute monarchy, which preserved archaic feudal orders and class divisions, began to come into conflict with the needs of a changed society. The strict framework of protectionism and mercantilism limited economic freedom entrepreneurs forced to produce only goods beneficial to the royal treasury. Dramatic changes occur within the classes. From the depths of the third estate grows an economically powerful, educated, enterprising class of capitalists, which has its own idea of ​​the role and tasks of state power. In the Netherlands, England and France, these contradictions were resolved in a revolutionary way, in other countries there was a gradual transformation of an absolute monarchy into a limited, constitutional one.

    Questions to the text:

    C1 Make a plan for the text. To do this, highlight the main semantic fragments of the text and title each of them.

    C2 What signs of absolutism are mentioned in the test? Name at least three. How is their relationship accomplished?

    C3 How is the progressive influence of absolutism manifested at the initial stage of its formation? In what ways is absolutism regressive? In both cases, name at least two signs.

    C4 What class grows out of the “third estate” under an absolute monarchy? In what two ways are the contradictions between it and absolutism resolved?

    C5 In Russia, during the reign of Peter I, the economy was dominated by the policy of mercantilism and protectionism. Explain how these facts are related. What role did this economic course play at that time? Provide a piece of text that will help answer this question.

    C6 One of the ideologists of the Russian autocracy gave the following assessment of parliament: “Parliamentary figures belong, for the most part, to the most immoral representatives of society; with extreme limitations of the mind, with the limitless development of selfishness and malice itself, with baseness and dishonesty of motives, a person with a strong will can become the leader of the party and then becomes the leading, dominant head of a circle or meeting, at least to him) to the meeting over which he dominates) belonged people far superior to him in mental and moral qualities. “Do you agree with this point of view? Provide at least 2 arguments to support your opinion.

  • The state reaches the highest degree of centralization; an extensive bureaucratic apparatus is created; The activities of class representation bodies are terminated.

    Absolutism fought against the separatism of the feudal nobility, subordinated the church to the state, eliminated the remnants of feudal fragmentation, introduced uniform laws - this was the progressive initial influence. And the regressive influence - the strict framework of protectionism and mercantilism limited the economic freedom of entrepreneurs, forced to produce only goods beneficial to the royal treasury.

    Under an absolute monarchy, a capitalist class will arise “from the 3rd estate.” Contradictions are resolved between it and absolutism in two ways: by revolutionary means or by a gradual transformation into a limited, constitutional monarchy.

  • 1) people build dams on rivers, and beavers build dams on rivers. Explain how human activities differ from the actions of a beaver?

    2) the spider skillfully weaves a web - a network with the help of which it obtains food for itself. a man catches fish using a fishing net. he uses the net in a sieve, in a tennis and badminton racket. a man-made tulle curtain on a window is also a net.

    Think about how the production of webs by a human differs from the weaving of a web by a spider?

    3) read the poem and express your attitude to the author’s words

    For a person, thought is the crown of all living things.
    And purity of the soul is the basis of existence.
    By these signs we find a person:
    He is above all creatures on earth from eternity.
    And if he lives without thinking and without believing,
    Then man is no different from the beast.

    4)explain how the two statements differ:

    1) Man is a biological and social being.
    2) Man is a biosocial being

    5) indicate what is inherent in a person by nature, and what by society

    6) describe what the social (social) essence of a person is.

    7) name which of the considered human qualities you value more than anything.

    8) refer to the above words of Chekhov and think about whether every person can play a prominent role in society; noble role? Can any of you make history? If yes, then how?

    9) Express your attitude to the statement of the French historian Marx Bloch: “History... is characterized by its own aesthetic joys, unlike the joys of any other science. The spectacle of human activity, which constitutes its special subject, is more capable of conquering the human imagination than any other.”

  • 1) People build dams in order to survive and not drown, and beavers build them in order to survive, and to feed themselves, and to live somewhere.
    2) a spider weaves a web for the same reason - it needs to eat and live somewhere. In the houses, especially of grandparents, spiders live right in the houses - they not only give freedom from mosquitoes and flies, but also give happiness. .. Throwing a spider out of the house means losing happiness from home. Well, it’s true that human networks are different from spider ones. After all, a person grows everything himself. That is, a person creates networks with the help of herbs, petals and roots. The same goes for curtains - they, too, are not a pure product, but a harvested crop. The spider itself weaves a web without harvesting. The web is its own dignity.
    3) Thought is the result of the work of the brain. Without thought, a person would not be able to make a decision or achieve anything in life. Not having thoughts means not having reason. Well, the purity of the soul is the internal state of a person - pain, joy, sadness, etc.... etc. e. the soul is a reflection of your mood and your intentions. By all accounts, this is a person consisting of soul and thought, willpower and mood. He is stronger and smarter than all the animals. Wasn't it a man who invented a gun that can even kill an elephant? If a person does not live peacefully and always thirsts for the blood of others, then he is no longer a person. He's already a beast.
    4) I don’t know)
    5) Nature determines his form, thought and personality, his parents and people similar to him. But society gave him a name, character, language, friends and much more.
    6) I don’t know that either)
    7) Among the human qualities that need to be valued are determination, loyalty, honesty and friendliness.
    8) Anyone can create their own story. You can create it in different ways. That's why Stalin and Peter 1 are so famous? Because they carried out a number of important reforms in Russia. And since we live in this century. That history can be created by writing a book, a story. You can do something important in life (It is not necessary to save the world from the invasion of strangers). You just need to do something kind to a person, and he will remember it for the rest of his life. That is, in his memory there will already be a short episode, a good episode, from your life.
    9) With the help of history, we can imagine a picture, imagine the life of a particular person. Imagination is our assistant. And it can help to better understand the story, better accept the picture, and maybe even create this picture. This is why we have dreams.
  • Adapted to the tastes of the broad masses of people, it is technically replicated in the form of many copies and distributed using modern communication technologies.

    The emergence and development of mass culture is associated with the rapid development of mass media, capable of exerting a powerful influence on the audience. IN media There are usually three components:

    • facilities mass media (newspapers, magazines, radio, television, Internet blogs, etc.) - replicate information, have a regular impact on the audience and are aimed at certain groups of people;
    • means of mass influence(advertising, fashion, cinema, popular literature) - do not always regularly influence the audience, are aimed at the average consumer;
    • technical means of communication(Internet, telephone) - determine the possibility direct communication person to person and can serve to transmit personal information.

    Let us note that not only the media have an impact on society, but society also seriously influences the nature of the information transmitted in the media. Unfortunately, the demands of the public often turn out to be low culturally, which reduces the level of television programs, newspaper articles, variety shows, etc.

    In recent decades, in the context of the development of means of communication, they talk about a special computer culture. If previously the main source of information was the book page, now it is the computer screen. Modern computer allows you to instantly receive information over the network, supplement the text with graphic images, videos, and sound, which ensures a holistic and multi-level perception of information. In this case, text on the Internet (for example, a web page) can be represented as hypertext. those. contain a system of references to other texts, fragments, non-textual information. The flexibility and versatility of computer information display tools greatly enhance the degree of its impact on humans.

    At the end of the 20th - beginning of the 21st century. Mass culture began to play an important role in ideology and economics. However, this role is ambiguous. On the one hand, mass culture made it possible to reach wide sections of the population and introduce them to cultural achievements, presenting them in simple, democratic and understandable images and concepts, but on the other hand, it created powerful mechanisms for manipulating public opinion and forming an average taste.

    The main components of mass culture include:

    • information industry- the press, television news, talk shows, etc., explaining current events in clear language. Mass culture was initially formed in the sphere of the information industry - the “yellow press” of the 19th - early 20th centuries. Time has shown the high efficiency of mass communication in the process of manipulating public opinion;
    • leisure industry- films, entertaining literature, pop humor with the most simplified content, pop music, etc.;
    • formation system mass consumption, which centers on advertising and fashion. Consumption here is presented as a non-stop process and the most important goal of human existence;
    • replicated mythology- from the myth of the “American Dream”, where beggars turn into millionaires, to the myths about “national exceptionalism” and the special virtues of one or another people compared to others.

    XX century to characterize the changed place of culture in modern society. The time of its appearance was the middle of the 20th century, when the media (radio, print, television) penetrated into most countries of the world and became available to representatives of all social strata. The exceptionally intensive development of the media and communications has led to the fact that not an individual person, but a large number of- a lot of people. Unlike elitist culture, mass culture focuses on the average level of mass consumers.

    The phenomenon of mass culture reflects the impact of the modern technogenic world on the formation of human personality. It is unique as the art of manipulating elementary “sub-human” reactions and impulses (“drives”) of masses of people, using the most refined achievements of culture (technology and science). A system of proven techniques is created, designed for the simplest unconditional reactions, attraction, increased eventfulness, and shock moments are used.

    Mass culture is emphatically focused on entertainment, quite cheerful, and in many ways exploits such areas of the human psyche as the subconscious and instincts.

    Let's consider the influence of television on popular culture.

    Television is a very young cultural phenomenon, which, when it arose, had to be integrated into the already existing “system of things” and into the corresponding system of ideas. For comparison: when the first car was created (1895), its shape resembled the shape of a carriage and, we emphasize, could not be different: in the minds of both the creators of the car and all other people, the idea of ​​a carriage as the most comfortable means of transportation dominated. Let's call the carriage a model-prototype of a car in order to briefly characterize the phenomenon itself. The entry of television into culture demonstrates the same approach and, very importantly, something completely new.

    When radio appeared (A.S. Popov, 1895), the prototype model was sounding human speech, and later sounding music, that is, phenomena dating back to the beginning of human culture. When cinema arose (the Lumière brothers, 1895, J. Méliès), its prototype models were theater (the European tradition dates back to the ancient theater of the 5th century BC) and photography (the founders were inventors L. J. M. Daguerre, 1839 , J. N. Niepce in France; W. G. F. Talbot, 1840-1841, in England), which, in turn, had painting as its prototype (origin - about 40,000 BC. ). Thanks to photography, cinema has already come closer to the “television effect” that interests us.

    When television emerged, it did not rely on ancient prototype models; they were represented by radio and cinema, that is, new phenomena that themselves had not yet been sufficiently mastered by humanity (additionally: newspaper, an older model). Subsequently, the same effect was repeated with the emergence of computer culture (in particular, the Internet), where among the prototype models it is necessary to name, first of all, television. Behind the latest models ancient and even new models are viewed only historically, outside of current awareness, and this is something new that was formed in culture with the advent of television.

    It is the renewal of prototype models that occurs in the culture of the twentieth century that can explain why the essence of television remains insufficiently identified.

    The newest models themselves have not yet been fully mastered, which leads to a desire to rely on a more solid foundation (that is, a more familiar one).

    Hence the concept of television as a new art form. There was an extensive discussion on this matter. From the stated point of view, its hidden meaning is in drawing an analogy between television (new in culture) with art (old, mastered, understandable in culture) or in criticizing this analogy.

    One can provide a large amount of evidence confirming that television is a special form of art (or more broadly, artistic culture).

    Then, having accepted the general thesis, it is necessary to take the next step - to compare television with various types art (artistic culture). No matter how the specifics of the artistic possibilities of television are revealed, its tendency to be secondary and focused on a multimillion-dollar audience, that is, the features of mass artistic culture, will inevitably come to the fore. This, it seems, led to the now traditional idea of ​​television as a form of mass culture (which acted as an explanatory model-prototype of television). The concept of “mass culture” is painted in negative tones, hence it is quite logical to transfer this emotional shade to the conceptual interpretation of television.

    Meanwhile, television, despite all its external similarities to mass media artistic culture, plays a different role, obviously so new that it cannot be easily defined through analogy and requires special research.

    A unique property of television as a communicative subsystem of culture is the transmission of images over a distance. It fulfilled mankind’s long-standing dream of a kind of “all-vision”, the ability to look beyond the horizon of visible living space. Thanks to this, television spread so quickly and widely and turned out to be so in demand by people.

    “Television messages - especially now, with the presence of communication satellites - come from all over the world, which means that the great gift of television is that through it the whole world has gained visibility. And since TV does not “remove” the viewer from his everyday environment, on the contrary, it itself strives there, then together with television the whole world bursts into the home of an individual... In the era of television, it is not a person who travels around the world, but images from all over the world - from all countries and continents - rush towards the TV viewer and, having lost materiality, swarm around him - as if then to obediently fall into his “total social experience“and “model of the world,” wrote the famous television researcher V. I. Mikhalkovich.

    Television expands the boundaries of the real world, accessible to human vision and comprehension, completes and complements the sociocultural space available to the individual, that is, it contributes to the formation of an individual image of reality. This means that a particular person’s requests for television as a source of information about the surrounding reality are, in general, the same as for reality itself.

    The French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu makes a very accurate observation: “For some of our philosophers (and writers) “to be” means to be shown on television, that is, to eventually be noticed by journalists or, as they say, to be in good standing with journalists (which is impossible without compromises and self-compromise). And indeed, since they cannot rely only on their works to continue to exist for the public, they have no other choice but to appear on the screen as often as possible, and therefore write at regular and as short intervals as possible works, the main the function of which, according to Gilles Deleuze, is to provide their authors with an invitation to television.”

    Personality, constantly navigating in a world of changing social conditions, can impose a wide variety of requirements on television content. Life orientation is one of the most important functions of television in relation to the viewer, along with recreational and compensatory ones. For example, a person does not understand the sphere of self-realization. He lacks human interaction. He needs some kind of life alternative if the directly accessible social reality is not valuable and desirable enough. In search of answers to these requests, people also turn to TV.

    Television programs, in turn, reflecting this or that part of social reality, organizing it, carry certain meanings of this reality that can influence a person, acting as sources of value alternatives for sociocultural guidelines in relations with the world. Therefore, special attention should be paid to such a feature of television programs as the formation of these alternatives for the viewer, and their specific content should be considered in the context of the three defining processes of human life: activity, behavior and communication. By perceiving certain meanings of television programs, forming new sociocultural guidelines on their basis, a person can form a personal value attitude towards them, and these new guidelines can, in the words of B.M. Sapunov, “to determine his life attitudes and behavior.” .

    The role of television is characterized by multifunctionality. However, in the multiplicity of specific functions, two fundamental functions stand out, which allows us to talk about the bipolar functionality of television. The first function is informational. The second function is leisure.

    The information function is a basic feature of television as a cultural phenomenon. To clarify this idea, let us compare the showing of a feature film in a cinema and on television.

    In a cinema, no matter how poorly technically equipped it may be, we encounter the work of art itself, this is the form of its existence.

    On the contrary, a film shown on television, even the most advanced one, is only information about a work of art (just as “La Gioconda” by Leonardo da Vinci, which we see in an illustrated magazine or book, is only information about a painting located in Louvre).

    In a narrower and more familiar sense, information on television acts as a collection of information about events and news.

    At a new stage in the development of television broadcasting (in our country since perestroika, in the West much earlier) information function television has fundamentally changed in content (and, as a consequence, in forms), because the very idea of ​​​​television information has changed.

    The domestic viewer, brought up on the programs of informational and educational (with a clearly expressed ideological attitude) Soviet television, was amazed by the appearance on television commercial advertising. At first inept, imitating Western models, then more and more qualitative, even talented, she persistently interfered with the broadcast network.

    Information-advertising permeates the entire sphere of television broadcasting. It is both open in nature (commercials) and hidden (mentions of advertising objects in the speech of presenters and participants in programs, clothes, hairstyles, other surroundings of characters that are authoritative for the audience, what they hold in their hands, what they touch, what they look at what they listen to, what surrounds them, etc.). Information about events, turning into advertising information, changes its structure.

    Thus, the sequence of news programs of the Soviet period (official block - working life of the country - foreign news block - cultural news - sports - weather) is replaced by another sequence: the most sensational news (disaster, murder, etc.) - less sensational news (which includes, for example, the official block). If a major scientific discovery is made, this is the material at the end of the issue, but if a scientist received the Nobel Prize, this is the beginning.

    In Soviet times, a certain percentage of negative news in the information program was established: no more than 40%.

    An analysis of modern news shows that negative news prevails even on official channels. On some (for example, on “RenTV” with Romanova) their number reaches 90% and sometimes even more.

    The news is interrupted by advertisements. A stable tandem emerges: the real news of the day is terrible (contract killings, corruption, wars, terrorism), catastrophic (hurricanes, tsunamis, mass epidemics), terrible for the common man (fires, leaks, failures in energy systems, water supply, sewerage, poor living conditions , low salaries, bribes of low-level officials, unfair trials, deprivation of benefits, rising prices for food, gasoline, increased housing costs, negligence in schools and hospitals, fraud, hooliganism, drunkenness, poverty), while in commercials the viewer is presented with an ideal, happy life(wonderful things - from tights to refrigerators, all washing powders, medicines for any disease according to the latest scientific developments, almost free loans for almost any amount, allowing you to dance even on critical days, pads, shampoos that add volume to your hair and mascara to your eyelashes, saving you from caries toothpastes and chewing gums, luxury cars and latest model computers, exciting films, grandiose concerts, political parties guarding the interests of the people).

    These two blocks constantly alternate, collectively awakening the polar emotions of viewers, through which television culture essentially has a suggestive influence on the consciousness and subconscious of millions.

    Sensationalism as a principle of presenting information on modern television turns out to be a connecting bridge in the bipolarity of the main functions of television - informational and leisure.

    Television, reflecting new realities, has developed its own new forms that implement the leisure function. In the spectrum of these actual television forms, two television genres emerged that found themselves at different poles: the video clip (the brevity of which reflected the option of minimizing leisure) and the television series (the duration of which, reaching several thousand episodes, reflected the option of maximizing leisure). Between these poles, the talk show took an intermediate place, combining information and leisure as television functions, but not through sensationalism, but through the illusion of interactivity.

    “If Rome gave the world law, England - parliamentary activity, France - culture and republican nationalism, then the modern USA gave the world a scientific and technological revolution and mass culture.”Mass culture- a culture that is popular and dominant among a wide segment of the population in a given society. It may include such phenomena as everyday life, entertainment (sports, pop music, popular literature), the media, etc.

    Mass culture does not express the refined tastes or spiritual quest of the people. The time of its appearance is the middle of the 20th century, when the media (radio, print, television) penetrated into most countries of the world and became available to representatives of all social strata. Mass culture can be international and national. Pop music is a vivid example of this: it is understandable and accessible to all ages, all segments of the population, regardless of level of education.
    IN socially mass culture is forming a new social system, called the “middle class”.
    The purpose of mass culture is not so much to fill leisure time and relieve tension and stress in a person in an industrial and post-industrial society, but rather to stimulate consumer consciousness in the viewer, listener, reader, which in turn forms a special type of passive, uncritical perception of this culture in a person. In other words, the human psyche is manipulated and the emotions and instincts of the subconscious sphere of human feelings and, above all, feelings of loneliness, guilt, hostility, and fear are exploited.

    Elite culture

    Elite culture - this is high culture , contrasted with mass culture by the type of impact on the perceiving consciousness, preserving its subjective characteristics and providing a meaning-forming function.
    The subject of elitist, high culture is the individual - a free, creative person, capable of carrying out conscious activities. The creations of this culture are always personally colored and designed for personal perception, regardless of the breadth of their audience, which is why the wide distribution and millions of copies of the works of Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, and Shakespeare not only do not reduce their significance, but, on the contrary, contribute to the widespread dissemination of spiritual values. In this sense, the subject of elite culture is a representative of the elite.
    Elite culture has a number of important features.

    Features of elite culture:

    • complexity, specialization, creativity, innovation;
    • the ability to form a consciousness ready for active transformative activity and creativity in accordance with the objective laws of reality;
    • the ability to concentrate the spiritual, intellectual and artistic experience of generations;
    • the presence of a limited range of values ​​recognized as true and “high”;
    • a rigid system of norms accepted by a given stratum as mandatory and strict in the community of “initiates”;
    • individualization of norms, values, evaluative criteria of activity, often principles and forms of behavior of members of the elite community, thereby becoming unique;
    • the creation of a new, deliberately complicated cultural semantics, requiring special training and an immense cultural horizon from the addressee;
    • the use of a deliberately subjective, individually creative, “defamiliarizing” interpretation of the ordinary and familiar, which brings the subject’s cultural assimilation of reality closer to a mental (sometimes artistic) experiment on it and, in the extreme, replaces the reflection of reality in elite culture with its transformation, imitation with deformation, penetration into meaning - conjecture and rethinking of the given;
    • semantic and functional “closedness”, “narrowness”, isolation from the whole of the national culture, which turns elite culture into a kind of secret, sacred, esoteric knowledge, and its bearers turn into a kind of “priests” of this knowledge, chosen ones of the gods, “servants of the muses,” “keepers of secrets and faith,” which is often played out and poeticized in elite culture.