Which monitor to buy for working with photographs. The ideal monitor for a photographer: what is it like? The Best Monitors for Intermediate Photographers

There is a well-established opinion among amateurs that monitor models with high brightness and contrast are suitable for professional work with photographs is obviously erroneous. Of course, the main property that should be followed is correct color rendering. After all, for a professional it is important that the photograph looks as natural as when photographed and when subsequently printed. As a convenience for a photo editor, a professional monitor for color correction should have a rotating mechanism for working on a photograph in both landscape and portrait mode, although many color correctors and retouchers ignore this feature.

Color correction and photo editing on LCD monitors

Many color veterans still ignore LCD monitors as a professional tool for working with photography. Several years ago this opinion was justified, and even now monitors in the lower price segment are no different high performance brightness, contrast and color rendition. To this day, professional photographers say that TN matrices do not produce deep enough blacks, which we cannot but agree with. The only thing I criticize is the users sitting behind cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors with a choking toad on their neck and unwillingness to spend money on an inexpensive LCD monitor model with an IPS matrix, which is not only characterized by high contrast, but also natural color rendering. Yes, and you can't ignore it advantages of LCD monitors:

  • low power consumption
  • compact size and light weight
  • support for modern interfaces

Resolution and monitor dimensions for working with photography

Using monitors with a small diagonal and low resolution for photo processing is very difficult. The generally accepted modern minimum of professional monitors for working with color is considered to be 21.5-inch widescreen monitors with a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. You should simply forget about models with a 4:3 aspect ratio.
When looking for the best option for image processing, choose monitors with a diagonal of 24 to 27 inches and a resolution of 1920×1200 pixels; as a result, you will get a significant gain in image height compared to conventional FullHD models. It is worth considering the dots per inch density, it should not be too low, otherwise excessive grain will interfere with photo processing.

It is also worth paying attention to the surface of the screen; it should be matte in order to eliminate glare and reflections on the display when working in a bright room. If you are used to working in dim light, then the glossy surface will not be a hindrance.

Selecting a monitor matrix for color correction

From consideration, we immediately discard solutions based on TN matrices and move on to liquid crystal panels with PVA, MVA, PLS and IPS, since such matrices are quite capable of correct color rendering.
PVA (Patterned Vertical Alignment) and MVA (Multi-domain Vertical Alignment) matrices are used primarily in inexpensive professional monitors due to a number of disadvantages. Despite good color rendition, large viewing angles and low black brightness, these types of matrices suffer from PVA/MVA - color shift, which consists of a shift in the color gamut when viewed at an angle other than 90° and a decrease in detail dark shades when viewed at right angles to the screen. Based on this, it is almost impossible to see the image in true colors on PVA/MVA monitors.

Liquid crystal panels with PLS matrices are still more often used in tablets than in monitors, but you can find several models based on them on sale. The disadvantages of PLS ​​technology include uneven illumination and insufficient contrast.

The best option for a professional monitor would be a display based on an IPS (In-Plane Switching) matrix. Liquid crystal panels of this type have not only high contrast, but also viewing angles of up to 178′, which allowed them to get rid of the disadvantages inherent in PVA and MVA technologies. And if we talk about the disadvantages, then IPS has only one - longer response time compared to TN matrices. Plus, there is a tendency for the cost of such monitors to decrease.

Monitors with cheap IPS matrices

When choosing a professional monitor for working with color, it confuses many people. a big difference in price with the same diagonal and resolution, and this is caused by the use in their production various types IPS matrices. For example, a 2 1.5-inch monitor based on a simplified e-IPS matrix costs about 6 thousand rubles. It cannot be used for professional color work, but it has tangible advantages over TN matrices, being a worthy option for an amateur or working on a home photo archive.

Monitors with S-IPS (Super-IPS) and H-IPS (Horizontal IPS) matrices are much more expensive than devices based on e-IPS technology, because such monitors use an A-TW polarizer, which neutralizes the glow of the LCD panel when looking at it under angle (glow effect), which affects the cost and is used in expensive monitor models.

It is especially important for a color corrector that the future monitor supports screen calibration, which simplifies preparation monitor for working with color. Both top models and relatively inexpensive options have this opportunity.

Disadvantages of e-IPS matrix

  • reduced color depth
  • color distortion in smooth transitions

Even despite the shortcomings of the e-IPS matrix, there are very decent options for working with photography. For those who take photographs privately and would like to get excellent results when processing photos with small investments into a monitor, e-IPS is an excellent option.

Color gamut

Expanded color gamut - very useful property monitor, but it is available only in expensive models. They can support color representation up to 10 bits per channel (or 8 bits with AFRC emulation). You may ask, why do I need 10-bit color? This is necessary in order to get a more natural picture than with an 8-bit component. True, if the multimedia image is not intended for monitors with an extended color gamut, the transitions between colors will be rougher, and the colors themselves will be oversaturated. This problem was solved by emulating the standard color gamut (sRGB color space), but not always successfully. In addition to emulation, the situation can be resolved thanks to, since some applications are able to automatically recode color in accordance with the ICC profile.

Using a cheap monitor for photo processing, you risk missing complex shades; you simply may not see them (for example, a certain shade of green). If your monitor cannot show 10% of the hues of the color space, then the monitor covers 90% of the sRGB space. By this characteristic (sRGB space coverage) you can judge the correctness of color reproduction by your monitor. Most monitors reproduce 90-95% of the color space and this is a good indicator. As for monitors on a TN matrix, their color rendering accuracy is often only 50-60%.

Monitors for working with color and photo editing

When talking about monitors for color correction and photo processing, one cannot help but mention EIZO leading Japanese company producing high quality professional monitors for working with color. Thanks to highest quality images and innovative technologies production, EIZO professional monitors are chosen by many design studios around the world. The ColorEdge series of professional monitors is designed to meet the needs of graphic design, printing, digital photography and other areas requiring uncompromising color management. Currently available in Russia are the Eizo ColorEdge CG275W and Eizo ColorEdge CG276W models.

  • 10-bit color depth
  • internal color correction table (Look Up Table)
  • adjustable height, visor

Apple has always been famous as a company that stands for computer technology interests of designers, photographers and people demanding color reproduction. Quite a lot of photographers use Macs; I recommend it for users who are not constrained by a budget, because when buying an iMac, you are purchasing not only a monitor, but also a computer.

Screen 27 inches with LED backlight(aspect ratio - 16:9, resolution - 2560x1440). High-quality IPS matrix with accurate color reproduction.

  • excellent brightness
  • aspect ratio 16:10
  • landscape and portrait mode

  • full set of interfaces
  • aspect ratio 16:10
  • height adjustment

  • low cost with good performance
  • Convenient display position adjustment
  • USB ports for connecting peripherals

It doesn't matter who chooses the monitor: professional photographer or just a person passionate about photography - the first thing that comes to mind when choosing a monitor is, of course, the size. Previously, monitors with a diagonal of 19 and 21 inches were especially popular, but now 27- and 32-inch panels are the most popular. From a photographer's point of view, working with images on a large screen provides a much higher degree of satisfaction in the process. In addition, a larger screen accommodates more windows, which also improves productivity when using professional imaging software. So, given the above, is "more is better" when we're talking about about monitor size? Unfortunately, it is not. The optimal distance between the user and the monitor is directly proportional to the size of the monitor. Ideally, this distance should exceed the size of the monitor (diagonal viewing area) by 1.5 times. In other words, the larger the monitor, the greater the distance from it to the user should be. If the user is too close to the monitor, the image on the screen will look blurry, which, at a minimum, will lead to discomfort and ultimately have a negative impact on vision. On the other hand, a user who is too far from the monitor simply will not be able to distinguish image details or even text. Thus, when it comes to choosing a monitor, it turns out that “bigger” is not always “better”. The ideal size monitor ensures optimal quality of work and content viewing with maximum visual comfort.

The most common monitors among photographers are 27-inch monitors. This size is also recommended by experts. This choice is due to two reasons. First of all, 27 inches is a large enough size to provide the user with optimal comfort when working and viewing images. It is also perfect for cases where users use professional image processing software: Overall operating efficiency is greatly improved. In addition, if you simultaneously open two images on the screen of a 27-inch monitor, the area of ​​each of them will be sufficient to easily process and compare them. Secondly, the optimal distance between a 27-inch monitor and the user is 100 cm, and this is the distance most of us work from our monitors when processing images.

The advantage of large monitors is their ability to fully display all open windows and other content, which increases user satisfaction when viewing images. Smaller monitors have lower native resolution and larger pixel spacing, which forces the user to constantly scroll or drag elements on the screen to find the desired content or function.

When choosing a computer, the focus is on its components, on which the overall functionality depends. But peripheral devices, such as speakers, controls and monitor, also have a significant impact on the PC's capabilities and ease of use. About,This material will tell you what to look for when buying a display for a gaming computer and which screen to buy for multimedia tasks.

Main selection criteria: decoding characteristics

Before, how to choose a monitor for work, games or entertainment, it is advisable to familiarize yourself with the list of main selection criteria in order to fill gaps in knowledge (if there are none, you can skip this subheading) and not get lost in the abundance of specific terms.

  • Diagonal. The main parameter that indicates the screen size. Measured in inches.
  • Proportions. The vertical and horizontal aspect ratio of the matrix. Today, the most popular widescreen models are those with 16:9 aspect ratios. Monitors with a 16:10 ratio are becoming a thing of the past, but the standard 21:9 (2.39:1) has appeared. Few companies still produce 5:4 and 4:3 displays. Important to remember: with an equal diagonal, a model with proportions 5:4 or 3:4 will have a larger area than a widescreen screen.
  • Permission. The number of active points that form the picture. The higher this parameter, the better and more uniform the image will look, but the greater the load the computer’s video card will experience.
  • Matrix type. Type of technology used in screen production. The most common are TFT TN, TFT IPS, TFT PLS, and OLED.
  • Viewing angle. The maximum angle at which a picture retains its original visual quality.
  • Response time. The interval between applying a signal to a pixel and changing its (pixel) color to the required one. Measured in milliseconds (ms). The smaller it is, the faster the screen changes the image and draws graphic elements more smoothly.
  • Color gamut. An indicator indicating the number of shades that the screen is capable of displaying, out of all the shades that the eye is physically capable of distinguishing, or defined by international standards. Indicated as a percentage of the reference parameter (for example, the sRGB spectrum). The value of the number of colors in the characteristics does not affect the color gamut.

    A multi-colored figure is the spectrum of colors visible to the naked eye, a black triangle is the color gamut of the sRGB standard, white is the color center of a professional screen

    The number 65,536, 262,144, or 16,777,216 colors indicates the number of subpixel brightness combinations possible for each pixel. At the same time, the human eye is physically capable of distinguishing only 1-2 million shades. On a low-quality display with a claimed 16 million colors, all possible shades will be within the sRGB triangle, and the eye will not see a difference between most adjacent shades. That is, for example, 1,000 or 10,000 possible variations of the same color will appear identical. For a professional model with the same 16 million colors, some of the possible values ​​are outside the triangle if the color gamut is more than 100% sRGB.

  • Contrast. The ratio between the maximum and minimum possible brightness of a pixel. Indicated as a proportion of the form 500:1, 10000:1, etc.
  • Panel surface type. There are matte and glossy laptop matrices. The former are not subject to glare under the rays of light, the latter are a little brighter, but tend to produce glare, quickly get dirty and leave streaks. For a professional monitor, a matrix with a matte surface is preferable.
  • Connection interface. The type of cable used to connect the PC and monitor. There are analog and digital image transmission standards, the most popular of which are VGA, DVI, HDMI and Display Port.

These are not all the characteristics of computer displays, but it is these parameters that are most important. Each application category specifies the criteria that must be considered first beforehow to choose a monitor for work, games or entertainment.

How to choose a monitor for work

When selecting a display for professional use, the characteristics should be studied most carefully. For a specialist working with graphics data, it is important to ensure that the screen characteristics match the main tasks as closely as possible. At the same time, depending on the type of activity, both “internal” and “external” display parameters can be fundamental.

Choosing a monitor for working with text documents and tables

The category of tasks associated with viewing and editing text data includes the work of representatives of many professions: from a secretary to a programmer, writer or journalist. To comfortably work with text, the “external” characteristics of the monitor are crucial.


The type of matrix and its resolution, viewing angle, response time, contrast and color gamut of all modern monitors (even budget ones) will be sufficient for working with text and tables, so they can be neglected. The type of connection should be selected based on the availability of connectors on the video card. The most preferred and universal protocol is HDMI, which is now installed on all graphics cards and allows you to connect to a display wide range devices.

How to choose a monitor for working in AutoCAD and other engineering programs

Before how to choose a monitor for working in AutoCAD, important to consider individual characteristics professions. Depending on what type of data is displayed on the screen most often, the decision will depend.


TO How to choose a monitor for working with graphics

Graphics is precisely the area of ​​activity in which the “internal” (undetectable at the first visual contact with it) parameters of the display are of great importance. Before choosing a monitor for working with images and other graphic information, it is important to carefully study its description.


Choosing a monitor for gaming

For gamers, the quality of the monitor plays an important role, since it determines how attractive the gaming world will look. The monitor also affects the level of comfort: successful models help reduce eye fatigue, allowing you to have fun longer without compromising your health.


Today we will talk about monitors suitable for working with photos. First, we need to understand what parameters we are interested in and which ones, in principle, are worth paying attention to. Basically, this is the type of matrix, size, aspect ratio and, in addition to everything, screen coverage, PWM, manufacturer, interfaces, price. We will also touch on calibration and the factor of different color display on monitors.

UPD: It is worth mentioning that this article was written primarily for people who realized that they need to change their monitor, but do not yet understand anything about it. It's more like a reminder in simple language For potential buyer monitor for working with photos. For advanced users or professionals, it will not be very informative, because... has a short overview of the characteristics.

Matrix type: An IPS matrix is ​​best suited for working with photos, as it displays colors perfectly and has good viewing angles. There are several modifications of Ips matrices: S-Ips, H-IPS and others. These are all modifications of the usual IPS matrix, some simpler, some better. If you don’t make money from photography or have a limited budget, then don’t worry and choose a specific matrix. Just make sure it's Ips. Well, if your budget allows you to choose a better monitor, then it’s worth bothering with Ips modifications.

Matrix bit size: There are 6, 8, 10-bit. The more, the better the colors and gradients are conveyed. Budget monitors usually have 6-bit and pseudo-8-bit monitors. Pseudo-8-bit is when there is a 6-bit matrix and it emulates 8 bits, but in fact it is still 6 bits. If you need good quality and you don’t have a very small budget, then it’s better to look at 8 or 10. If you choose a completely budget monitor, then don’t worry and take any one - it will most likely be pseudo-8-bit.
For reference:
6 bit - 262 thousand colors.
8 bit - 16 million colors.
10 bits - 1 billion colors.

Screen size: The best option- this is 24” or more. Even 22” is no longer such a comfortable size; your work area will still be smaller. The edges of the screen are usually eaten away by the interface of the program you are working in, be it Photoshop with its panels or any raw converter. If you want more (and the space on the table allows), then take more - 27” or 30”.

Aspect Ratio: There are 2 options - 16:9 and 16:10. Most models currently on the market are 16:9. But it’s better to take 16:10, because... you will have 1” more screen height. Roughly speaking, you have a larger monitor. And its resolution will be normal 1920x1200, and not cropped 1920x1080. For working with photos, 16:10 is really more convenient to work with. From a technical point of view there is no difference, just a different size. It is worth noting that if the monitor is 27”, then there is only a 16:9 option. If 30”, then 16:10.

Screen Coverage: Glossy or matte. Glossy - like a mirror. You see yourself in the reflection, and on a sunny day you see everything in front of the screen. It has a little more contrast and gives a richer picture. This is where the advantages end. Matte does not glare, no reflections or anything else. Nowadays, almost all 24” monitors with an aspect ratio of 16:10 and IPS matrix are made matte. This makes me happy.

PWM: This is an abbreviation for pulse width modulation. Simply put, this is flickering of the screen backlight (mostly noticeable at low brightness). Some people get tired of such monitors, and some don’t even notice. You won’t find out about this before purchasing, only after working for a long time at the monitor. But most don't notice. I advise you not to bother with this point.

Manufacturer: This is a very interesting point. I may upset some (those who love stereotypes), but on the contrary, I will please others. So here it is. Now it doesn’t matter who the monitor manufacturer is, because... Almost all matrices are made by LG. There is a stereotype, for example, that only Dell and NEC are excellent, and the rest suck... But LG makes matrices for both of them too :) And even Apple she does. So the manufacturer can be anyone. Anyway, in 90% of cases you buy a matrix from LG. So it goes. It should be noted here that if you compare NEC for 50 tr. and some BenQ for 10 tr, then the difference, of course, will be noticeable. But this is not a question of the manufacturer, but a question of the price segment itself. It is clear that there is no such thing as cheap and perfect.

Interfaces: Everything is simple here. The most popular are DVI and DisplayPort. VGA is already dying, HDMI is also fading into the background, because... designed more for TVs than for monitors. Therefore, look at what outputs you have on your video card and select the appropriate monitor.

Price: Depends on the width of your wallet. But the principle is standard, budget ones are worse, expensive ones are better. For example (very average) monitors up to 15 tr. - these are all budget monitors. You should not expect ideal brightness gradients and a very cool matrix from them. Monitors from 15-20 thousand are already in the middle segment, you can find a really good option. Monitors of thousands from 35 and above can be considered an expensive segment. There you can choose what is called the ideal option (to the extent possible due to technical limitations). For most people working with photography, the budget segment is suitable. And if you are a professional photographer (I don’t just mean people who consider themselves such, but truly professionals), then it’s better to take a good monitor, because if anything happens, you will be responsible for your work to the customer (color/ladders and all other delights that may come out during printing).

Additional tidbits: Usually this is a USB hub and a portrait mode of the monitor (when you can rotate the monitor to a vertical position). USB is actually a convenient thing. You can shove a webcam or any other small devices you need there, and the wires won’t be pulled from the system unit. Portrait mode is rarely needed. Those who really need it know about it anyway. In other cases it is practically not used.

And now let's talk about what you also need to know.

Calibration: Definitely needed. It is done so that all people with IPS matrix monitors see the same color. We took a photo, sent it to a photo lab for printing, and received the printed material exactly as you saw it on your monitor. We gave it to the customer - he also sees exactly what you saw. Those. the colors seem to be standardized and become correct (black is really black, gray is really gray, etc.). Even if you are not a professional, but bought a monitor on an IPS matrix, it is better to calibrate it once. If you are a pro, then you probably know that it occasionally needs to be calibrated again.

Matrix features: Budget IPS matrices have such features as tint and glow.

Tint- this is when one side of the monitor can give off a little in one color, and the other side in another (purple/green). Can be locally anywhere, but usually closer to the edges. There is no treatment, because... iron problem. Just choose more carefully when purchasing. Look clean grey colour, white - usually noticeable on them. If it is clearly expressed, then ask for another copy.

Glow- this is when the black color is not quite black. For example, you turn on the black screen screensaver and see that at certain angles the monitor seems to glow a little, i.e. not perfectly black. It also cannot be treated in any way, but at the same time it does not interfere in any way. You don’t process a 500*500 pixel image on a completely black background. Just know that it exists, but you shouldn’t even worry about it.

Expanded color gamut- in most cases not needed (gets in the way). And for calibration it even causes extra hemorrhoids. But if you are buying a monitor just for home, watching movies, playing games, looking at pictures, then you can use it. The image will be a little richer.

I have some colors on my monitor, but my friend (at work/customer, etc.) has others. Yes, this is the case, because... Everyone's monitors are different. Calibration partly solves this problem. But not only on yours, but also on the second monitor. In 99% of cases this is impossible. You won’t advise every customer to calibrate monitors. And not everyone has a normal monitor on an IPS matrix. The vast majority of monitors have a TN matrix. These are the most budget-friendly monicas, even if you calibrate them or not, you still won’t get the right colors. Of course it will get better, but he will still lie. Therefore, this problem cannot be solved in any way. And you shouldn’t even try to process images somehow with the expectation of that other monitor. It's all dancing with a tambourine.

I honestly tried to make it short and succinct... but it turned out to be a lot of letters :) I touched on even more than the average user needs. But information is never superfluous.

If you have any other questions, ask.

PS: I have an HP LP2475w monitor (24”, 16:10, honest 8 bits).

The choice of monitor for a photographer largely determines the result of his work. The task of this device is to convey colors as accurately as possible and have a number of other properties. What to rely on when choosing a model? You can figure out the problem by analyzing the main parameters, as well as based on the ratings of popular models, reviews of specialists and users.

Color gamut and number of colors

These parameters are the most important when choosing a screen. Color gamut is an indicator that determines the range that a monitor can display. The higher this indicator, the more pure and saturated colors are displayed on the screen. The term “number of colors” characterizes the number of shades between two adjacent ones in the spectrum. A larger value of the parameter allows you to “smooth out” this difference.

The colors reproduced by a computer screen are divided into a certain number of gradations. You can set a specific color to a specific gradation, which means that as the color range increases, relative to the number of colors, the difference between the tones adjacent in the spectrum also increases. A large gap between the first and second indicators leads to the appearance of transverse stripes on smooth gradients.

Attention! Extended range monitors require mandatory calibration.

Matrix type

The parameter that you should pay attention to first of all. All other characteristics depend on it. For each type of monitor, matrices of varying complexity are used. LCD monitors are as follows:

The first type is equipped with the simplest matrix, which is distinguished by the fastest possible response, i.e. updating the image. At the same time, this outdated model has a number of disadvantages. The TN matrix has a small viewing angle, poor color rendering, and low contrast. One of the main disadvantages is the inability to accurately display black color.

The IPS matrix is ​​capable of effectively conveying depth in color model sRGB. It has a wide angle reaching up to 140 0 . To improve the performance of this type of matrix, upgrades are being made to reduce response time (H-IPS), increase the contrast level, and expand the viewing angle and brightness (AFFS). Measures to improve IPS matrices are regularly carried out by all popular equipment manufacturers.

Compromise MVA technology makes it possible to see deep blacks due to good contrast. The viewing angle here reaches 170 0 . One of the disadvantages is the lack of detail in the shadows, which depends on the viewing angle and color balance.

Brightness and Contrast

Working with photographs and images largely depends on these parameters. The first one displays the amount of light emitted by a surface and the second one is determined by the ratio between the maximum and minimum brightness when viewed against a black and white background.

Advice. To check the brightness of the monitor stated in the passport, you should set the parameters to maximum and evaluate the image. If, at the same time, there is a desire to reduce the value, then the reserve of the brightness parameter can be considered sufficient.

What else to pay attention to

In addition to the main ones, there are equally important additional parameters:

  1. Screen surface. It can be matte or glossy. The first option is more comfortable for the eyes and does not create glare, but on this monitor the image looks less bright. When working with a glossy surface, you have to strain your eyes more, reflecting objects get in the way.
  2. Diagonal and resolution. Interdependent parameters. The larger the monitor size, the higher the resolution should be. This approach also increases the cost of equipment, while an excessively large screen is not required for photo processing. A screen of 24 (1920x1200) - 27 (2560x1440) inches can provide comfort in work.

The most favorable for working with photography are monitors with an IPS matrix. It is this that ensures correct color rendering. It is better to avoid cheap models with TN, PVA and MVA matrices. To work indoors, when the monitor is located near a window or other light sources, you should choose a screen with a matte finish. At the same time, if you need maximum picture brightness and have the ability to adjust the room illumination, you can opt for glossy. The optimal monitor size is at least 24 inches.

Color gamut and number of colors are the most important indicators

Rating of popular models

ASUS VX239H

The 23-inch model, with excellent color rendition, occupies a leading position in the ratings. Equipped with an AH-IPS matrix, HDMI input, two speakers with a power of 1W. The 1.5 cm thick screen supports VividPixel and MHL technologies. Working with graphic images is very convenient and pleasing to the eye, as noted by photographers. As a bonus - high-quality work without delays, as well as the GamePlus function.

BenQ GW227OH

High-quality screen with a diagonal of 21.5 and an A-MVA matrix. The device has a fairly wide field of view and is characterized by high image contrast and improved white balance. There is an option to manually adjust color rendering. This is convenient if you have to work under conditions of changing light sources (lamps with lamps of different temperatures, the sun). Comfort for vision, with long work provides special mode GW2270H.

BenQ BL2411PT

A versatile 24-inch model, well suited for various purposes, including image processing. Built-in IPS panel ensures efficiency. Three video inputs are supported, including HDCP. There is an energy-saving function, as well as a periodic reminder to give your eyes a rest. Working with photographs is made easier due to good color rendering, contrast, lack of glare and backlight flickering, as well as uniform black color. Pleasant design complements the graphic, intuitive menu.

DELL U2515H

The model has established itself as one of best options for photographers and designers. The clarity of the picture and the softness of color rendering are ensured by the IPS matrix, as well as a semi-matte surface and glare protection. The black light characteristic of this type of matrix is ​​almost absent on this model. The diagonal of the model is 25 inches with a resolution of 2560x1440. Such parameters provide correct image scaling when working in photo and video editors. A functional stand allows you to adjust the position and angle of the monitor.

When choosing a monitor for regular work with images, it is important to pay attention to the type of matrix, screen diagonal and resolution, as well as brightness and contrast. Screens with a matte finish are more favorable for vision. You should not choose expensive oversized models; a screen with a diagonal of 24 is quite enough. Before purchasing, it is better to test the monitor, adjusting the brightness and contrast settings.

How to choose a monitor for a photographer: video